Religious Scumbags and Pedophiles

I can't stand all these scumbags that hide behind their title and then hide behind their position within the organization in order to prey on little kids. Somehow to me, and maybe this is just rhetoric, but I don't know, but to me I don't think normal punishment is enough for these people. I don't care what causes their "condition". We ought to just shoot them.

Having sex with children is wrong, stupid, illegal ,immoral, ignorant and very criminal. Everyone involved with it should be punished. Everyone who hid them, or obscured who they were or their location should be punished. Everyone who obstructed justice by moving them all over Hell's half acre should be punished. Everyone who knew about it and did nothing to stop it should be punished. Everyone who was involved in any way should be punished. Anyone still in power that did not stop it and knew about it should first be removed from their position then they should be punished. I think if we had prosecuted everyone involved there would've been a whole lot more people going to jail than there ever has been publicly admitted. it is shameful, and it is not who we are as a society. We let these scumbags get off easy and no way should it have happened.

I think that taking advantage of your position within your organization (like for example if were are a Catholic priest), is bad enough. What makes it worse is that you were a pedophile for 30 years and your superiors knew about it. What did they do to solve the problem? They transferred you from parish in Brooklyn New York to a parish in Des Moines Idaho. They hid you. They knew you were one that was going to seek out little kids, molest them ,scar them and abuse them and they did nothing to stop it.

NOTHING at all.

Oh they may have sat in their offices and wrung their hands a little bit and said "Oh woe is me what are we ever going to do about these priests that pick on and have sex with little boys ?", but what did they do to protect the little boys? Nothing is what they did, nothing. They offered no solution and were in fact part of the problem.

They had various titles, they were bishops, they were archbishops, they were Cardinals, they were superior father I don't know and you know what, it doesn't matter what their titles were. They know who they are. They are lucky that one of those children were not one of my children, they would've made their peace with God a long time ago.

In my view anyone who sheltered a pedophile knowing full well that they were guilty of abusing little kids were just as guilty as the pedophile was himself. They were part of a conspiracy to deprive the victims protection under the law, they put the financial well-being of their church ahead of the spiritual well-being of their congregations, they put consideration for their own careers ahead of the well-being of what's now turning out to be thousands if not hundreds of thousands of young men for decades maybe centuries. it is repulsive, sickening and wrong.

We should not look at it any differently because the people involved were in involved in the Catholic (or any other) religion. If this had happened within a Little League organization there would've been a perp walk with 40 people in it, in front of five o'clock news ,being pelted by rocks, in front of the police station the next day.

Why would I call it a conspiracy well, a conspiracy is defined as "an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons".  let's see the actions of the pedophile priests superiors meet the definition of conspiracy.

1. Was it evil? – What is more evil than allowing one human to prey on another human and that human be a child. Yes.
2. Was it unlawful? –  Sex with children is unlawful. Too easy. Yes
3. Is it treacherous? – I can think of not very many other things that could be defined as more treacherous than subverting the trust of a preteen child and then forcing him to have anal sex with a person that he is supposed to trust. Yes
4. Was it surreptitious? (Meaning was it conducted in secret) – one suppose it was I'd never seen any of the documents that said  " This is how we are going to hide the pedophilia priests". Yes
5. Were two or more people involved? – I am assuming that the superior and the priest had at least one conversation and when he told the guy he was being transferred to Idaho or Iowa or lower Podunk in the middle of nowhere he probably asked a question or two. I'm assuming there were questions about allegations, I'm assuming there is some reason for them to suspect him of pedophilia in the first place. I think all of those statements are fair assumptions. Yes

So we meet the definition of conspiracy pretty easily. So that I wonder why all of these people that made all these decisions about moving these pedophiles all over the place and hiding them from authority wonder why they didn't go to jail or were charged or why they were not indicted in greater numbers with conspiracies charges? Because you know why ? Because if they were exposed it would be found out that many of them are the same as the priest they were moving ,and it would be found at I think that there is more pedophilia that has not been exposed then there is pedophilia that has been exposed. It is called CYA.

I posted a fairly short video on the subject and a couple others on YouTube.

Click the link to follow it .

what my user name is BGBOS , Check out rant number seven , click like if you liked it.

look at Rant number 7


Thanks for reading this and also watching my rants on YouTube.

– big Mike